Short answer: it depends on the strategy, and the running costs matter as much as the account size.
Different arbitrage strategies have very different capital profiles. Speed-driven strategies need infrastructure more than balance; capital-driven strategies need a working balance to be worth the effort.
| Strategy | Rough starting account | What drives the minimum |
|---|---|---|
| Latency arbitrage (forex) | Low thousands | Infrastructure cost, not balance. The feed and VPS are the real spend |
| Crypto cross-exchange | Few hundred and up | You need balance parked on multiple venues at once |
| Funding-rate / basis (crypto) | Few hundred and up | Capital-driven: the return scales with size, so tiny is not worth it |
| News trading | Few hundred to low thousands | Position size must be meaningful relative to costs |
| Pair / statistical arbitrage | Low thousands | Two legs, margin on both, room to hold through drawdown |
For a focused walkthrough of the smallest realistic forex start, see our dedicated guide on starting forex arbitrage with small capital.
The account balance is only half the budget. Arbitrage is an infrastructure business, and the recurring costs decide whether a small account can ever get ahead.
| Cost | Why you need it |
|---|---|
| VPS or co-location | Low, stable latency to the broker. For latency arbitrage this is not optional |
| Price feed | The fast reference that gives you the edge in the first place |
| Software | The engine, plus tools to test and monitor execution honestly |
| Spread and commission | Paid on every trade. On a tiny account these dominate the outcome |
The most common beginner mistake is opening the smallest possible account, expecting to grow it, and being surprised when it bleeds out. Three forces work against a micro balance. Fixed running costs are the same whether you trade one hundred dollars or ten thousand, so they eat a small account proportionally alive. Minimum lot sizes force a trade size that is reckless relative to a tiny balance, so a normal losing streak wipes it out. And there is no room to survive drawdown, so the account dies before the edge has enough trades to show itself.
Put the pieces together and a realistic first budget is the trading balance plus at least a few months of running costs held in reserve, so the operation can survive a normal cold streak. For capital-driven crypto strategies you can start lean, in the low hundreds, because the speed requirement and infrastructure are lighter. For latency arbitrage, budget for real infrastructure first and treat the trading balance as secondary, because there the spend is the feed and the VPS, not the float in the account.
Realistically no for latency arbitrage, because running costs and minimum lot sizes will overwhelm the balance. A capital-light crypto strategy can start smaller, but even then, tiny accounts are fragile. See our small-capital guide for the honest floor.
For latency arbitrage, the infrastructure. The feed, VPS, and software are the real cost of entry, and they matter more than the size of the trading balance.
Capital-driven crypto strategies like funding-rate arbitrage have the lightest infrastructure requirements, which makes them the most approachable low-budget entry point.
New articles, research papers, and product releases, delivered when we publish them.
See the honest minimum for a forex arbitrage start, and the tools to test an edge before you fund an account.